new hampshire: have poverty rate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have poverty rate 1.00
have low poverty rate 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, have poverty rate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new hampshire, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mississippi, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mississippi, have poverty rate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new hampshire, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have poverty rate)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(new hampshire, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have low poverty rate)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(new hampshire, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have low poverty rate)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new hampshire, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, have low poverty rate)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(new hampshire, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have low poverty rate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(new hampshire, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have poverty rate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new hampshire, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have poverty rate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have poverty rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mississippi, have poverty rate)