new hampshire: is nickname

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is nickname 1.00
be nicknamed state 0.84
be nicknamed primary state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be nicknamed state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(alabama, be nicknamed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(alabama, be nicknamed state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is nickname)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be nicknamed state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be nicknamed state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be nicknamed state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be nicknamed state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be nicknamed primary state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be nicknamed primary state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be nicknamed primary state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be nicknamed primary state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is nickname)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is nickname)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is nickname) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(alabama, be nicknamed state)