new jersey: be better than pennsylvania

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents team
Weight: 0.71
, new york city
Weight: 0.67
, new york
Weight: 0.67
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bergen
Weight: 0.46
, football team
Weight: 0.36
, basketball team
Weight: 0.35
, baseball team
Weight: 0.34
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than pennsylvania 1.00
be better than new york 0.81
be much cooler than new york 0.79
have higher population than alaska 0.77
be cheaper than new york 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new jersey, be better than new york)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(new jersey, be better than new york)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new jersey, be better than new york)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new jersey, have higher population than alaska)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(new jersey, be cheaper than new york)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(new jersey, be cheaper than new york)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new jersey, have higher population than alaska)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(new jersey, be cheaper than new york)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(new jersey, have higher population than alaska)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, have higher population than alaska)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, be better than new york)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, be cheaper than new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(new jersey, be better than pennsylvania)