new mexico: have white sand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents texas
Weight: 0.74
, mexico
Weight: 0.73
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nevada
Weight: 0.68
, los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.67
, san diego
Weight: 0.67
, colorado
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have white sand 1.00
have sand 0.95
has color blue 0.76
be blue state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(mexico, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(new mexico, have white sand)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(texas, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(new mexico, have white sand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(texas, has color blue)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(mexico, has color blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(texas, has color blue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mexico, has color blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(nevada, has color blue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(california, has color blue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(colorado, has color blue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(mexico, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have white sand)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(texas, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have white sand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(colorado, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(colorado, has color blue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(nevada, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(nevada, has color blue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(california, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(california, has color blue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(new mexico, have white sand)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(new mexico, have sand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have sand)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(new mexico, have sand)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have sand)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(new mexico, be blue state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new mexico, has color blue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, be blue state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(new mexico, be blue state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(new mexico, be blue state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has color blue)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has color blue)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(new mexico, has color blue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(new mexico, have white sand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(texas, has color blue)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mexico, has color blue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(colorado, has color blue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(nevada, has color blue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(california, has color blue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(texas, has color blue)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(new mexico, have white sand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mexico, has color blue)