new mexico: is dry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents texas
Weight: 0.74
, mexico
Weight: 0.73
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nevada
Weight: 0.68
, los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.67
, san diego
Weight: 0.67
, colorado
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dry 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(colorado, is dry)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(san diego, is dry)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(california, is dry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(colorado, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(colorado, is dry)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(san diego, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(san diego, is dry)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(california, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(california, is dry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(new mexico, is dry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is dry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new mexico, is dry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(colorado, is dry)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(san diego, is dry)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(california, is dry)