new mexico: was admitted to union

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents texas
Weight: 0.74
, mexico
Weight: 0.73
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nevada
Weight: 0.68
, los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.67
, san diego
Weight: 0.67
, colorado
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
was admitted to union 1.00
was admitted state 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(texas, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(new mexico, was admitted to union)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(texas, was admitted to union)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(texas, was admitted to union)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(texas, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(new mexico, was admitted to union)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(new mexico, was admitted to union)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(new mexico, was admitted state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(new mexico, was admitted state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new mexico, was admitted state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was admitted state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was admitted to union)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(new mexico, was admitted to union)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(texas, was admitted to union)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(new mexico, was admitted to union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(texas, was admitted to union)