new mexico: was called land

Related concepts

Parents	texas Weight: 0.74 , mexico Weight: 0.73 , north america Weight: 0.69 , country Weight: 0.65
Siblings	nevada Weight: 0.68 , los angeles Weight: 0.68 , california Weight: 0.67 , san diego Weight: 0.67 , colorado Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was called land	1.00
be called land	0.97
be known as land	0.86
be nicknamed land	0.79
was called land of enchantment	0.79
be called land of enchantment	0.76
be called land of enchanted	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(mexico, be called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(new mexico, was called land)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(mexico, be known as land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(new mexico, was called land)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(mexico, be called land of enchantment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(new mexico, was called land)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(mexico, be called land)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(mexico, be known as land)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(mexico, be called land of enchantment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(mexico, be called land)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(mexico, be called land of enchantment)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(mexico, be known as land)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(mexico, be called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(new mexico, was called land)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(mexico, be known as land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(new mexico, was called land)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(mexico, be called land of enchantment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(new mexico, was called land)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(new mexico, was called land)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(new mexico, be called land)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(new mexico, be called land)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(new mexico, be known as land)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(new mexico, be called land)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, be called land)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was called land)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(new mexico, was called land)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(mexico, be called land)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mexico, be known as land)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mexico, be called land of enchantment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(mexico, be called land)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mexico, be known as land)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(new mexico, was called land) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mexico, be called land of enchantment)