new orleans: be big on voodoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.68
, hurricane
Weight: 0.68
, texas
Weight: 0.67
, memphis
Weight: 0.67
Siblings louis armstrong
Weight: 0.72
, mardi gras
Weight: 0.66
, washington
Weight: 0.62
, minnesota
Weight: 0.57
, gumbo
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be big on voodoo 1.00
have voodoo 0.97
be famous for voodoo 0.96
be known for voodoo 0.95
has quality voodoo 0.95
be associated with voodoo 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(new orleans, be big on voodoo)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(new orleans, be famous for voodoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(new orleans, be known for voodoo)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(new orleans, be famous for voodoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be famous for voodoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(new orleans, be associated with voodoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(new orleans, be known for voodoo)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be known for voodoo)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(new orleans, be associated with voodoo)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be associated with voodoo)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be famous for voodoo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be known for voodoo)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be associated with voodoo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be big on voodoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(new orleans, be big on voodoo)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new orleans, be big on voodoo)