new orleans: be prone to floods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.68
, hurricane
Weight: 0.68
, texas
Weight: 0.67
, memphis
Weight: 0.67
Siblings mardi gras
Weight: 0.66
, washington
Weight: 0.62
, minnesota
Weight: 0.57
, gumbo
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prone to floods 1.00
be vulnerable to flooding 0.88
was vulnerable to flooding 0.88
be prone to hurricanes 0.84
be at risk of flooding 0.83
be susceptible to hurricanes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(new orleans, be prone to floods)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(new orleans, was vulnerable to flooding)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(new orleans, was vulnerable to flooding)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(new orleans, be vulnerable to flooding)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new orleans, was vulnerable to flooding)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(new orleans, be vulnerable to flooding)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(new orleans, be at risk of flooding)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(new orleans, be at risk of flooding)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be vulnerable to flooding)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be at risk of flooding)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, was vulnerable to flooding)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be at risk of flooding)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be vulnerable to flooding)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be prone to floods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(new orleans, be prone to floods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(new orleans, be prone to floods)