new york city: was such good center of trade

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.90
, town
Weight: 0.73
, new england
Weight: 0.73
, city
Weight: 0.72
Siblings brooklyn bridge
Weight: 0.72
, empire state building
Weight: 0.69
, ellis island
Weight: 0.69
, albany
Weight: 0.68
, african american
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
was such good center of trade 1.00
have history of trade 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(new york city, was such good center of trade)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(city, was such good center of trade)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(city, was such good center of trade)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(new york city, was such good center of trade)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(new york city, was such good center of trade)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(new york city, have history of trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(new york city, have history of trade)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new york city, have history of trade)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(new york city, have history of trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was such good center of trade)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(new york city, was such good center of trade)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, was such good center of trade)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(new york city, was such good center of trade) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, was such good center of trade)