new york: be referred as apple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york city
Weight: 0.90
, america
Weight: 0.72
, chicago
Weight: 0.72
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.73
, washington
Weight: 0.71
, las vegas
Weight: 0.70
, new yorker
Weight: 0.68
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be referred as apple 1.00
be referred as big apple 0.97
be known as apple 0.93
be called apple 0.92
called apple 0.92
get called apple 0.91
be called apple state 0.90
be known as big apple 0.90
be called big apple 0.89
is apple 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(new york city, be referred as big apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as apple)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(new york city, be known as big apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as apple)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(new york city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as apple)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(new york city, be called big apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as apple)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(new york city, be called apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as apple)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called apple)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(new york city, be referred as big apple)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new york city, be known as apple)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called big apple)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called apple)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be referred as big apple)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be known as apple)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called big apple)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be known as big apple)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called apple state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(new york city, be referred as big apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(new york, be referred as apple)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(new york city, be known as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(new york, be referred as apple)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(new york city, be known as big apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(new york, be referred as apple)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(new york city, be called big apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(new york, be referred as apple)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(new york city, be called apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(new york, be referred as apple)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(washington, be called apple state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(washington, be called apple state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(new york, be referred as apple)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(new york, be referred as big apple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york, be called big apple)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(new york, be called big apple)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(new york, be called big apple)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(new york, be called big apple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, be referred as apple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be called apple)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new york city, be referred as big apple)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as apple)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be called big apple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(washington, be called apple state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new york city, be referred as big apple)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be called apple)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as apple)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(new york, be referred as apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be called big apple)