new york: was called new orange

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york city
Weight: 0.90
, america
Weight: 0.72
, chicago
Weight: 0.72
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.73
, washington
Weight: 0.71
, las vegas
Weight: 0.70
, new yorker
Weight: 0.68
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was called new orange 1.00
was called in 1601 0.79
was originally called new amsterdam 0.78
was called new amsterdam 0.77
is new 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(new york, was called new orange)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(new york, was called new amsterdam)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new york, is new)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(new york, was called new amsterdam)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(new york, was called new amsterdam)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york, is new)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(new york, is new)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was called new amsterdam)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, is new)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(new york, was called new orange)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(new york, was called new orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(new york, was called new orange)