new zealand: was involved in ww2

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.71
, north america
Weight: 0.70
, europe
Weight: 0.69
, south africa
Weight: 0.69
Siblings new caledonia
Weight: 0.71
, tasmania
Weight: 0.71
, usa
Weight: 0.68
, south korea
Weight: 0.67
, canada
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was involved in ww2 1.00
was was involved in vietnam war 0.88
was involved in vietnam war 0.87
was involved in world war 2 0.82
was involved in world war 1 0.81
was affected by vietnam war 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(europe, was involved in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(new zealand, was involved in ww2)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(europe, was involved in world war 1) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(new zealand, was involved in ww2)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(europe, was involved in world war 2)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(europe, was involved in world war 1)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(europe, was involved in world war 2)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(europe, was involved in world war 1)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(south korea, was involved in vietnam war)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(europe, was involved in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(europe, was involved in world war 1) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(south korea, was involved in vietnam war) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(south korea, was involved in vietnam war)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(new zealand, was involved in ww2)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was was involved in vietnam war)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in vietnam war)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in world war 2)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in world war 1)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was affected by vietnam war)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(new zealand, was affected by vietnam war)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(new zealand, was involved in vietnam war)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(new zealand, was was involved in vietnam war)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(new zealand, was was involved in vietnam war)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new zealand, was involved in world war 1)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new zealand, was involved in world war 2)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(new zealand, was involved in world war 1)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(new zealand, was involved in world war 2)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was was involved in vietnam war)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was involved in world war 1)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was affected by vietnam war)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was involved in world war 2)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was involved in vietnam war)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new zealand, was involved in vietnam war)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(new zealand, was affected by vietnam war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(new zealand, was involved in ww2)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(europe, was involved in world war 1)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(europe, was involved in world war 2)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(south korea, was involved in vietnam war)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(europe, was involved in world war 1)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(new zealand, was involved in ww2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(europe, was involved in world war 2)