new: was good place

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.61
, change
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.59
, program
Weight: 0.58
, market
Weight: 0.57
Siblings new caledonia
Weight: 0.38
, software company
Weight: 0.32
, upgrade
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good place 1.00
was place 0.94
was good 0.89
was good location for city 0.80
was strong 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(new, was good place)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new, was place)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new, was place)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new, was good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(new, was place)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(new, was place)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(new, was good location for city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new, was strong)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(new, was good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(new, was good location for city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(new, was strong)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(new, was good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(new, was good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(new, was strong)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(new, was good location for city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new, was strong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(new, was good location for city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new, was good place)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(new, was good place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(new, was good place)