newport: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.65
, place
Weight: 0.56
, community
Weight: 0.56
, port
Weight: 0.54
, city
Weight: 0.53
Siblings norfolk
Weight: 0.36
, lexington
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35
, richmond
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste different 0.93
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(newport, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(newport, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(richmond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(newport, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(newport, taste different)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(newport, taste different)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(newport, taste different)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(newport, taste different)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(newport, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(newport, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(newport, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(newport, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(newport, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(newport, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(newport, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(newport, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(newport, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(newport, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(newport, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)