newspaper: be useful to historians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents periodical
Weight: 0.64
, television station
Weight: 0.64
, media
Weight: 0.61
, employer
Weight: 0.61
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings paper
Weight: 0.68
, newsweek
Weight: 0.64
, magazine
Weight: 0.64
, daily
Weight: 0.61
, herald
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful to historians 1.00
be useful 0.78
is useful 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(paper, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(paper, is useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(paper, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(newspaper, be useful to historians)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(newspaper, be useful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(newspaper, is useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(newspaper, be useful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(newspaper, is useful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(newspaper, is useful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(newspaper, be useful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, is useful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be useful to historians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(newspaper, be useful to historians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(paper, is useful)