newt: be allowed wand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amphibian
Weight: 0.66
, politician
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.57
, republican
Weight: 0.55
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.35
, frog
Weight: 0.35
, salamander
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allowed wand 1.00
have wand 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(newt, be allowed wand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(newt, be allowed wand)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(newt, be allowed wand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(newt, have wand)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(newt, be allowed wand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(newt, have wand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(newt, be allowed wand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(newt, have wand)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(newt, be allowed wand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(newt, have wand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(newt, be allowed wand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(newt, be allowed wand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(newt, be allowed wand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(newt, be allowed wand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(newt, be allowed wand)