niagara: be falls important to region

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.53
, film
Weight: 0.50
, location
Weight: 0.47
, program
Weight: 0.47
, title
Weight: 0.45
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.33
, venice
Weight: 0.33
, toronto
Weight: 0.32
, rochester
Weight: 0.32
, ottawa
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be falls important to region 1.00
be falls important to northeast region 0.92
be falls part 0.91
be falls part of two countries 0.90
be falls dangerous 0.89
be falls popular 0.89
be falls place 0.89
be falls unique 0.89
be falls important to northeast 0.89
be falls good place 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(niagara, be falls important to region)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(niagara, be falls place)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(niagara, be falls part)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(niagara, be falls part)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(niagara, be falls popular)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(niagara, be falls place)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(niagara, be falls important to northeast region)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(niagara, be falls part of two countries)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(niagara, be falls part of two countries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be falls place)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(niagara, be falls dangerous)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(niagara, be falls place)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(niagara, be falls important to northeast region)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(niagara, be falls unique)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(niagara, be falls good place)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(niagara, be falls important to northeast region)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(niagara, be falls important to northeast)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(niagara, be falls popular)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be falls popular)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(niagara, be falls unique)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(niagara, be falls popular)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(niagara, be falls unique)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(niagara, be falls dangerous)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(niagara, be falls dangerous)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be falls dangerous)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(niagara, be falls important to northeast)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(niagara, be falls good place)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(niagara, be falls good place)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(niagara, be falls important to northeast)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(niagara, be falls part)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be falls good place)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(niagara, be falls part of two countries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be falls part)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to northeast region)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be falls part of two countries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to northeast)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be falls unique)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be falls important to region)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(niagara, be falls important to region)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(niagara, be falls important to region)