niagara: be in shape

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.53
, film
Weight: 0.50
, location
Weight: 0.47
, program
Weight: 0.47
, title
Weight: 0.45
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.33
, venice
Weight: 0.33
, toronto
Weight: 0.32
, rochester
Weight: 0.32
, ottawa
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in shape 1.00
be in bad shape 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(niagara, be in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(niagara, be in shape)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(niagara, be in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be in bad shape)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(niagara, be in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(niagara, be in bad shape)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(niagara, be in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(niagara, be in bad shape)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(niagara, be in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(niagara, be in bad shape)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(niagara, be in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(niagara, be in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(niagara, be in shape)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(niagara, be in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(niagara, be in shape)