niagara: was created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.53
, film
Weight: 0.50
, location
Weight: 0.47
, program
Weight: 0.47
, title
Weight: 0.45
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.33
, venice
Weight: 0.33
, toronto
Weight: 0.32
, rochester
Weight: 0.32
, ottawa
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was created 1.00
was formed 0.84
were formed 0.79
was built 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(venice, was built)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(venice, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(venice, was built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(niagara, was created)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(niagara, was built)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(niagara, was formed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(niagara, was built)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(niagara, was formed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(niagara, was formed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(niagara, were formed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(niagara, was built)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(niagara, was formed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(niagara, were formed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(niagara, were formed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(niagara, were formed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(niagara, was built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(niagara, was created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(niagara, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(niagara, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(venice, was built)