nick: react to phone call

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents player
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.58
, job
Weight: 0.57
, friend
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, old man
Weight: 0.32
, turner
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
react to phone call 1.00
react to phone call revealing 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nick, react to phone call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(nick, react to phone call)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nick, react to phone call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nick, react to phone call revealing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(nick, react to phone call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(nick, react to phone call revealing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(nick, react to phone call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(nick, react to phone call revealing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(nick, react to phone call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nick, react to phone call revealing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(nick, react to phone call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(nick, react to phone call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(nick, react to phone call)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(nick, react to phone call) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(nick, react to phone call)