nickel: be in batteries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.63
, metal
Weight: 0.61
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings copper
Weight: 0.35
, molybdenum
Weight: 0.35
, zinc
Weight: 0.35
, tantalum
Weight: 0.35
, cobalt
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in batteries 1.00
be used in batteries 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cobalt, be in batteries)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zinc, be used in batteries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cobalt, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cobalt, be in batteries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zinc, be used in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(zinc, be used in batteries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(nickel, be in batteries)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(nickel, be used in batteries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(nickel, be used in batteries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nickel, be used in batteries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be used in batteries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be in batteries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nickel, be in batteries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cobalt, be in batteries)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nickel, be in batteries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(zinc, be used in batteries)