niece: have relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents girl
Weight: 0.72
, woman
Weight: 0.67
, child
Weight: 0.64
, brother
Weight: 0.59
Siblings daughter
Weight: 0.41
, grandmother
Weight: 0.40
, aunt
Weight: 0.40
, sister
Weight: 0.39
, old woman
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have relationship 1.00
have good relationship 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(aunt, have good relationship)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aunt, have relationship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(aunt, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(aunt, have relationship)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(aunt, have good relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(aunt, have good relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(niece, have relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(niece, have good relationship)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(niece, have good relationship)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(niece, have good relationship)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(niece, have good relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(niece, have relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(niece, have relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(aunt, have relationship)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(niece, have relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(aunt, have good relationship)