nihilism: is depressing philosophy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ideology
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.54
, belief
Weight: 0.51
, part
Weight: 0.45
Siblings liberalism
Weight: 0.37
, capitalism
Weight: 0.35
, atheism
Weight: 0.35
, materialism
Weight: 0.35
, political ideology
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is depressing philosophy 1.00
is depressing 0.87
is philosophy 0.86
be treated in philosophy 0.80
be treated in contemporary philosophy 0.79
be historically considered bad ideology 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(nihilism, is depressing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nihilism, is philosophy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nihilism, is depressing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(nihilism, is philosophy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(nihilism, be treated in contemporary philosophy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(nihilism, is philosophy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(nihilism, be treated in philosophy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(nihilism, be historically considered bad ideology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(nihilism, is depressing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nihilism, be treated in contemporary philosophy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(nihilism, be treated in philosophy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(nihilism, be treated in contemporary philosophy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(nihilism, be treated in philosophy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(nihilism, be historically considered bad ideology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(nihilism, is philosophy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(nihilism, be historically considered bad ideology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(nihilism, is depressing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(nihilism, be treated in contemporary philosophy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(nihilism, be historically considered bad ideology)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(nihilism, be treated in philosophy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nihilism, is depressing philosophy)