nipple: has state pain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, tissue
Weight: 0.53
, body part
Weight: 0.52
, skin
Weight: 0.49
Siblings mammary gland
Weight: 0.34
, penis
Weight: 0.34
, boob
Weight: 0.34
, bra
Weight: 0.34
, vagina
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pain 1.00
pain 0.93
has state sore 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(boob, has state sore)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(boob, has state sore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(boob, has state sore)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(nipple, has state pain)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nipple, pain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(nipple, pain)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(nipple, has state sore)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(nipple, pain)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(nipple, has state sore)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(nipple, has state sore)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(nipple, has state sore)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nipple, pain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nipple, has state pain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nipple, has state pain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nipple, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(boob, has state sore)