noise: be barrier to communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.69
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, behavior
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.58
Siblings loud music
Weight: 0.71
, alarm clock
Weight: 0.67
, vacuum cleaner
Weight: 0.66
, jitter
Weight: 0.62
, siren
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be barrier to communication 1.00
be important in communication 0.82
affect communication 0.81
affect communication between speakers 0.77
affect communication between speakers of standard english 0.77
affect communication between speakers of english 0.76
interfere with communication 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(noise, be barrier to communication)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(noise, affect communication)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(noise, affect communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(noise, interfere with communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(noise, affect communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(noise, affect communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(noise, interfere with communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(noise, be important in communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(noise, affect communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(noise, affect communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(noise, affect communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(noise, affect communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(noise, affect communication between speakers of standard english)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(noise, interfere with communication)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(noise, interfere with communication)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(noise, affect communication between speakers of standard english)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(noise, be important in communication)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(noise, affect communication between speakers of standard english)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(noise, be important in communication)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(noise, affect communication between speakers of standard english)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(noise, be important in communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noise, be barrier to communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(noise, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(noise, be barrier to communication)