noodle: be at pantry

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, chinese food
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings ramen
Weight: 0.42
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, soup
Weight: 0.34
, pretzel
Weight: 0.34
, potato chip
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at pantry 1.00
be store in cupboard 0.78
be at refrigerator 0.77
be at cupboard 0.76
be at fridge 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(staple, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(noodle, be at pantry)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese food, be at refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(noodle, be at pantry)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(thing, be store in cupboard)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(noodle, be at pantry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(staple, be at pantry)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(thing, be store in cupboard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese food, be at refrigerator)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(staple, be at pantry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be at refrigerator)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(thing, be store in cupboard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soup, be at cupboard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be at fridge)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(staple, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(noodle, be at pantry)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(thing, be store in cupboard)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(noodle, be at pantry)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese food, be at refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(noodle, be at pantry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(soup, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(soup, be at cupboard)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sandwich, be at fridge)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be at fridge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(noodle, be at pantry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(noodle, be at pantry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(staple, be at pantry)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(thing, be store in cupboard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese food, be at refrigerator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sandwich, be at fridge)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, be at cupboard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(staple, be at pantry)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(thing, be store in cupboard)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(noodle, be at pantry)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese food, be at refrigerator)