north pole: be top of world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south pole
Weight: 0.86
, area
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.64
, pole
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings telephone pole
Weight: 0.39
, north
Weight: 0.37
, south
Weight: 0.37
, west
Weight: 0.36
, south park
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be top of world 1.00
be placed at top of globe 0.88
be placed at top 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pole, be placed at top of globe)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(north pole, be top of world)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pole, be placed at top)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(north pole, be top of world)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pole, be placed at top)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pole, be placed at top of globe)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pole, be placed at top of globe)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pole, be placed at top)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pole, be placed at top of globe)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(north pole, be top of world)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pole, be placed at top)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(north pole, be top of world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(north pole, be top of world)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(north pole, be placed at top of globe)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(north pole, be placed at top of globe)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(north pole, be placed at top of globe)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(north pole, be placed at top of globe)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(north pole, be placed at top)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(north pole, be placed at top)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(north pole, be placed at top)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(north pole, be placed at top)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(north pole, be top of world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(north pole, be top of world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pole, be placed at top)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pole, be placed at top of globe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pole, be placed at top)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(north pole, be top of world)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pole, be placed at top of globe)