north pole: has state dark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south pole
Weight: 0.86
, area
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.64
, pole
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings telephone pole
Weight: 0.39
, north
Weight: 0.37
, south
Weight: 0.37
, west
Weight: 0.36
, south park
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state dark 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(area, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(north pole, has state dark)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(north pole, has state dark)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pole, has state dark)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(area, has state dark)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pole, has state dark)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(area, has state dark)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(area, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(north pole, has state dark)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(north pole, has state dark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(north pole, has state dark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(north pole, has state dark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(north pole, has state dark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pole, has state dark)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(area, has state dark)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pole, has state dark)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(area, has state dark)