norwegian: be good at english

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents airline
Weight: 0.47
, european
Weight: 0.47
, language
Weight: 0.46
, line
Weight: 0.46
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.33
, chinese language
Weight: 0.32
, german
Weight: 0.32
, swedish
Weight: 0.32
, english language
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good at english 1.00
speak good english 0.93
speak english well 0.90
speak english 0.89
speak english cleanly 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(swedish, speak good english)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(swedish, speak english)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(swedish, speak english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(swedish, speak english)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(swedish, speak good english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(swedish, speak good english)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(norwegian, be good at english)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(norwegian, speak english)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(norwegian, speak english)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(norwegian, speak english well)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(norwegian, speak english)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(norwegian, speak english well)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(norwegian, be good at english)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(norwegian, be good at english)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(swedish, speak good english)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(norwegian, be good at english) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(swedish, speak english)