note: be skeuomorphic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents negotiable instrument
Weight: 0.63
, addition
Weight: 0.63
, message
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings eighth note
Weight: 0.68
, quarter note
Weight: 0.64
, whole note
Weight: 0.63
, rose
Weight: 0.60
, tangerine
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be skeuomorphic 1.00
be skeumorphic 1.00
be in pasadena 0.88
being are deleted 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(topic, being are deleted)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(note, be skeuomorphic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(topic, being are deleted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(topic, being are deleted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(topic, being are deleted)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(note, be skeuomorphic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(note, be skeuomorphic)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(note, be skeumorphic)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(note, be skeumorphic)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(note, be skeumorphic)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(note, be skeumorphic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(note, be skeuomorphic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(note, be skeuomorphic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(topic, being are deleted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(note, be skeuomorphic)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(topic, being are deleted)