:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(topic, is hot cash)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(note, get hot)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(note, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(topic, is hot cash)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(note, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(topic, is hot cash)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(note, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(note, get hot)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(note, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(note, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(note, get hot)
Typical implies Plausible
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(note, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(note, get hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(note, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(topic, is hot cash)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(note, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(topic, is hot cash)