notebook: be more expensive than features

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.64
, product
Weight: 0.62
, device
Weight: 0.62
, laptop
Weight: 0.60
, computer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings thinkpad
Weight: 0.54
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.38
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than features 1.00
be usally more expensive than features 0.94
is more expensive 0.89
is expensive 0.82
be more expensive than pc 0.80
be usally more expensive than pcs with comparable power 0.77
be more expensive than pcs with comparable power 0.77
be more expensive than pcs 0.77
be more expensive than pcs with power 0.76
be usally more expensive than pcs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(laptop, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(laptop, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(laptop, is more expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(laptop, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(computer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(laptop, is more expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(laptop, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thinkpad, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(laptop, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(laptop, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(thinkpad, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(thinkpad, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be usally more expensive than features)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(notebook, be usally more expensive than features)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(notebook, is more expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(notebook, be usally more expensive than features)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(notebook, is more expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(notebook, be usally more expensive than pcs with comparable power)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be usally more expensive than pcs with comparable power)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(notebook, be usally more expensive than pcs with comparable power)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than pcs with comparable power)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(notebook, be more expensive than pcs with power)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(notebook, be more expensive than pcs with comparable power)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than pcs with power)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than pcs with power)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than pcs with comparable power)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than pc)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(notebook, be more expensive than pc)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(notebook, be usally more expensive than pcs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be usally more expensive than pcs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(notebook, be usally more expensive than pcs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than pc)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(notebook, be more expensive than pcs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than pcs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than pcs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(notebook, be usally more expensive than features)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(notebook, be usally more expensive than pcs with comparable power)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(notebook, be more expensive than pcs with power)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(notebook, be usally more expensive than pcs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(notebook, be more expensive than pcs with comparable power)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(notebook, is more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(notebook, is more expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(notebook, be more expensive than pcs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(notebook, be more expensive than pc)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(notebook, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(notebook, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(notebook, is more expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(notebook, is more expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(notebook, is more expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(notebook, is more expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(notebook, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(notebook, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(notebook, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(notebook, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(notebook, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(notebook, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(laptop, is more expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(laptop, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(thinkpad, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(laptop, is more expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(laptop, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(notebook, be more expensive than features)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is expensive)