nuclear fission: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.50
, source
Weight: 0.50
Siblings nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.36
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.36
, atomic bomb
Weight: 0.34
, atomic clock
Weight: 0.34
, nuke
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nuke, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(nuke, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(nuke, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuke, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(atomic clock, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(nuke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(nuke, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(atomic clock, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(nuclear fission, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nuke, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nuke, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(nuclear fission, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)