nuclear power plant: have melt downs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.85
, power plant
Weight: 0.72
, facility
Weight: 0.71
, power
Weight: 0.71
, chemical
Weight: 0.68
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.40
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.40
, water plant
Weight: 0.38
, hydro
Weight: 0.37
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have melt downs 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(power plant, have melt downs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, have melt downs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have melt downs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(power plant, have melt downs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have melt downs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(power plant, have melt downs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(power plant, have melt downs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have melt downs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, have melt downs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have melt downs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, have melt downs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(nuclear power plant, have melt downs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, have melt downs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have melt downs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have melt downs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, have melt downs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have melt downs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(power plant, have melt downs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(nuclear power plant, have melt downs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(power plant, have melt downs)