numeral: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symbol
Weight: 0.54
, information
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.46
, character
Weight: 0.46
, alphabet
Weight: 0.45
Siblings logo
Weight: 0.32
, digit
Weight: 0.32
, name
Weight: 0.31
, asterisk
Weight: 0.31
, pentagram
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality system 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(asterisk, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(asterisk, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(digit, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(logo, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(asterisk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(asterisk, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(logo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(logo, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(digit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(digit, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(asterisk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(asterisk, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(numeral, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(numeral, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(numeral, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(numeral, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(numeral, has quality system)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(numeral, has quality system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(numeral, has quality system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(numeral, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(numeral, has quality system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(numeral, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(numeral, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(logo, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(asterisk, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(digit, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(numeral, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(asterisk, has quality good)