nun: be given male names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.59
, member
Weight: 0.58
, sister
Weight: 0.53
, place
Weight: 0.50
, religious leader
Weight: 0.50
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.35
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.35
, priest
Weight: 0.35
, grandmother
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be given male names 1.00
have male names 0.96
take male names 0.95
use male names 0.95
be given names 0.90
be given different names 0.88
have men 's names 0.86
have names 0.84
get names 0.84
take names 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(place, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nun, be given male names)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(place, have names)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(place, have names)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(place, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nun, be given male names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(nun, be given male names)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nun, take male names)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(nun, take male names)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(nun, take male names)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(nun, have men 's names)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(nun, have men 's names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nun, have men 's names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(nun, take male names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(nun, have men 's names)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(nun, be given different names)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(nun, be given different names)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nun, be given different names)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(nun, be given different names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nun, be given male names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nun, be given male names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(place, have names)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(nun, be given male names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(place, have names)