nut: be called fruit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.59
, source
Weight: 0.58
, magazine
Weight: 0.58
, plant
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macadamia nut
Weight: 0.81
, acorn
Weight: 0.63
, hazelnut
Weight: 0.63
, pecan
Weight: 0.62
, almond
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called fruit 1.00
is fruit 0.98
be called dry fruit 0.92
leaves fruit 0.91
is fruits 0.87
be on vine real name 0.77
be on vine 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(almond, is fruit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(almond, is fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(almond, is fruit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(nut, be called fruit)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(nut, leaves fruit)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(nut, be called dry fruit)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(nut, is fruit)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(nut, leaves fruit)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(nut, is fruit)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(nut, be called fruit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nut, be called fruit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(nut, be called fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(almond, is fruit)