nut: has physical part fat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.59
, source
Weight: 0.58
, magazine
Weight: 0.58
, plant
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macadamia nut
Weight: 0.81
, acorn
Weight: 0.63
, hazelnut
Weight: 0.63
, pecan
Weight: 0.62
, almond
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part fat 1.00
be high in fat 0.88
is fatty 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pecan, has physical part fat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(almond, be high in fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pecan, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pecan, has physical part fat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(almond, be high in fat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(almond, be high in fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(nut, has physical part fat)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, be high in fat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(nut, is fatty)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(nut, be high in fat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nut, be high in fat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(nut, be high in fat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(nut, is fatty)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(nut, is fatty)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(nut, is fatty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nut, has physical part fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nut, has physical part fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pecan, has physical part fat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nut, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(almond, be high in fat)