nutmeg: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spice
Weight: 0.69
, ingredient
Weight: 0.67
, herb
Weight: 0.59
, fruit
Weight: 0.58
, seasoning
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ginger
Weight: 0.37
, cinnamon
Weight: 0.37
, coriander
Weight: 0.37
, fennel
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be bad for dog 0.96
be harmful to dogs 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinnamon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(nutmeg, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nutmeg, be bad for dog)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nutmeg, be bad for dog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(nutmeg, be bad for dog)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(nutmeg, be bad for dog)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(nutmeg, be harmful to dogs)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nutmeg, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nutmeg, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nutmeg, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cinnamon, be bad for dogs)