nylon: be at drawer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.69
, resin
Weight: 0.68
, fiber
Weight: 0.67
, material
Weight: 0.63
, polyester
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silk
Weight: 0.36
, steel wool
Weight: 0.36
, wool
Weight: 0.36
, bamboo
Weight: 0.36
, latex
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at drawer 1.00
be at woman closet 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(nylon, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(silk, be at woman closet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nylon, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(silk, be at woman closet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(silk, be at woman closet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nylon, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(nylon, be at drawer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(nylon, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(nylon, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(nylon, be at drawer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nylon, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(nylon, be at drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(nylon, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(silk, be at woman closet)