o: be negative in demand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, letter
Weight: 0.53
, part
Weight: 0.52
, event
Weight: 0.52
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.35
, jesus christ
Weight: 0.33
, oh
Weight: 0.32
, proper noun
Weight: 0.32
, shit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be negative in demand 1.00
is negative 0.85
is positive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(oh, is negative)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(oh, is negative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(oh, is negative)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(o, be negative in demand)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(o, is negative)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(o, is positive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(o, is negative)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(o, is positive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(o, is negative)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(o, be negative in demand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(o, be negative in demand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(o, be negative in demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(oh, is negative)