oak: be bad for birds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.74
, hardwood
Weight: 0.68
, wood
Weight: 0.67
, tree
Weight: 0.64
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.42
, maple tree
Weight: 0.39
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, beech
Weight: 0.39
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for birds 1.00
be important to survival of animals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(oak, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(oak, be bad for birds)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(oak, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oak, be important to survival of animals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(oak, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(oak, be important to survival of animals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(oak, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(oak, be important to survival of animals)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(oak, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(oak, be important to survival of animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(oak, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(oak, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oak, be bad for birds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(oak, be bad for birds)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(oak, be bad for birds)