oak: be called red oak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.74
, hardwood
Weight: 0.68
, wood
Weight: 0.67
, tree
Weight: 0.64
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.42
, maple tree
Weight: 0.39
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, beech
Weight: 0.39
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called red oak 1.00
be called oak 0.97
be called seven oaks 0.83
be called thousand oaks 0.80
has color red 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tree, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(oak, be called red oak)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(tree, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tree, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, has color red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tree, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oak, be called red oak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(maple tree, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(maple tree, has color red)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(oak, be called red oak)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(oak, be called seven oaks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(oak, be called thousand oaks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(oak, has color red)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(oak, has color red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(oak, has color red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(oak, be called seven oaks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oak, has color red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(oak, be called seven oaks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(oak, be called thousand oaks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(oak, be called thousand oaks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oak, be called seven oaks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(oak, be called thousand oaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(oak, be called red oak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(oak, be called red oak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(tree, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(maple tree, has color red)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be called red oak) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(tree, has color red)