oat: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cereal grain
Weight: 0.77
, grain
Weight: 0.70
, ingredient
Weight: 0.58
, food
Weight: 0.55
, cereal
Weight: 0.54
Siblings barley
Weight: 0.40
, wheat
Weight: 0.40
, rye
Weight: 0.38
, corn
Weight: 0.38
, wheat germ
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
is cheap 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oat, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cereal, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oat, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oat, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(grain, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oat, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cereal, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(grain, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cereal, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grain, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wheat, is more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oat, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cereal, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oat, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(grain, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oat, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oat, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wheat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(wheat, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(oat, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(oat, is more expensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(oat, is more expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(oat, is more expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(oat, is more expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(oat, is cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(oat, is cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(oat, is cheap)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oat, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oat, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oat, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(grain, is more expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cereal, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wheat, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cereal, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(grain, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oat, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)