object: fall

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.67
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, human being
Weight: 0.63
, celestial object
Weight: 0.61
Siblings comet
Weight: 0.73
, meteor
Weight: 0.70
, skull
Weight: 0.68
, sphere
Weight: 0.68
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall 1.00
fall faster in fall 0.92
fall at time 0.91
fall faster in free fall 0.88
fall to ground 0.87
all fall at time 0.87
fall at same time 0.86
be in free fall 0.85
all fall at same time 0.82
fall at rate 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(comet, fall)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(comet, fall)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(comet, fall)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(object, fall)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(object, fall to ground)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(object, fall to ground)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(object, fall to ground)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(object, fall to ground)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(object, fall at same time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(object, fall at same time)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(object, fall at same time)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(object, fall at same time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(object, fall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(object, fall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(object, fall)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(comet, fall)