oboe: be in marching band

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woodwind instrument
Weight: 0.72
, wind instrument
Weight: 0.69
, instrument
Weight: 0.66
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.63
, orchestra
Weight: 0.55
Siblings clarinet
Weight: 0.40
, flute
Weight: 0.40
, bassoon
Weight: 0.39
, cello
Weight: 0.39
, percussion instrument
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in marching band 1.00
be seen marching 0.91
be in band 0.84
be better than band 0.79
be in jazz band 0.79
be favored over band 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(orchestra, be better than band)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(oboe, be in marching band)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(orchestra, be favored over band)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(oboe, be in marching band)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(orchestra, be better than band)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(orchestra, be favored over band)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(orchestra, be better than band)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(orchestra, be favored over band)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(flute, be in marching band)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(flute, be in band)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, be in jazz band)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(orchestra, be better than band)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(oboe, be in marching band)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(orchestra, be favored over band)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(oboe, be in marching band)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(flute, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(flute, be in marching band)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(flute, be in band)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(flute, be in band)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(clarinet, be in jazz band)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(clarinet, be in jazz band)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(oboe, be in marching band)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(oboe, be seen marching)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(oboe, be seen marching)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be seen marching)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(oboe, be seen marching)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(oboe, be in band)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(oboe, be in band)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(oboe, be in band)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in band)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(oboe, be in marching band)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(orchestra, be better than band)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(orchestra, be favored over band)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(flute, be in marching band)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(flute, be in band)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(clarinet, be in jazz band)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(orchestra, be better than band)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(oboe, be in marching band)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(orchestra, be favored over band)