observation: be crucial performing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be crucial performing 1.00
is performed 0.80
be important in theatre 0.77
be crucial to process 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(observation, be crucial performing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(experiment, is performed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(observation, be crucial performing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(experiment, is performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(experiment, is performed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(observation, be crucial performing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(observation, be crucial performing)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(observation, be crucial performing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in theatre)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(observation, be crucial performing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(observation, be important in theatre)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(observation, be crucial performing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(observation, be important in theatre)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(observation, be crucial performing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in theatre)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(observation, be crucial performing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(observation, be crucial performing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(observation, be crucial performing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(observation, be crucial performing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(observation, be crucial performing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(observation, be crucial performing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(experiment, is performed)