observation: be good method of assessment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good method of assessment 1.00
is good method 0.86
is good research method 0.86
be important in method 0.85
is method 0.84
is research method 0.84
be important in scientific method 0.82
relate to method 0.80
be first step in scientific method 0.79
be first step in method 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(observation, be good method of assessment)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(observation, is method)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(observation, is good method)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(observation, is method)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(observation, be important in method)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(observation, is good research method)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(observation, is method)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(observation, be important in method)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(observation, is good method)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in method)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(observation, is good research method)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(observation, is good method)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(observation, relate to method)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(observation, relate to method)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(observation, is good research method)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(observation, be first step in scientific method)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(observation, relate to method)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(observation, be first step in scientific method)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(observation, be first step in scientific method)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(observation, is good method)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(observation, is good research method)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in method)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(observation, be first step in scientific method)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(observation, is method)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(observation, relate to method)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(observation, be good method of assessment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(observation, be good method of assessment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(observation, be good method of assessment)