ocean: is polluted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents river
Weight: 0.66
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.64
, vessel
Weight: 0.61
, force
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lake superior
Weight: 0.57
, coral reef
Weight: 0.36
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.35
, sea
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is polluted 1.00
be polluted 1.00
be polluted by plastic 0.91
has state pollution 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sea, be polluted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sea, be polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sea, be polluted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(ocean, is polluted)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ocean, be polluted by plastic)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ocean, be polluted by plastic)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ocean, be polluted by plastic)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ocean, be polluted by plastic)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ocean, has state pollution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ocean, has state pollution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(ocean, has state pollution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ocean, has state pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ocean, is polluted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ocean, is polluted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ocean, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sea, be polluted)